Jet boats on small rivers Why no restrictions for jet boats on small streams?
#1
Posted 17 December 2011 - 12:24 PM
#2
Posted 18 December 2011 - 09:53 AM
#3
Posted 18 December 2011 - 04:13 PM
Trevor Shpeley, on 18 December 2011 - 05:53 PM, said:
--Maybe motor cycles and mountain bikes should be banned from public trails... sorry couldn't resist...
--But do agree that regulation without enforcement is pretty much useless.
--Instead of banning or closing areas how about starting with opening areas where the use is appropriate and draw users to these areas where they can have their fun.
--How about new opportunities like... some of the open pit mines and tailings ponds that when filled with water would be new opportunities for theme style parks for use by specialty race boats and personal water crafts.
#5
Posted 19 December 2011 - 03:24 PM
platypus, on 18 December 2011 - 04:13 PM, said:
--But do agree that regulation without enforcement is pretty much useless.
--Instead of banning or closing areas how about starting with opening areas where the use is appropriate and draw users to these areas where they can have their fun.
--How about new opportunities like... some of the open pit mines and tailings ponds that when filled with water would be new opportunities for theme style parks for use by specialty race boats and personal water crafts.
Ya, I see your point, new regulations even when they make sense add to the already heavy regulation load. Best to educated the boaters than try to stop them without anybody to actually do the stopping. I've seen those jet boat parks in the states, they look pretty cool. Here's one to check out: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=UsNUR6tsoTs
#6
Posted 19 December 2011 - 08:41 PM
Our enforcement resources are already stretched too thin. It comes down to each individual boat user and boat owner to drive and ensure your boat is driven responsibly.
The Upper Pitt River would be first on my list of concerns. I know stories have made it to the TV and print media about the high number of jet boats running the river, sometimes way too fast and too close to shore. I guess as long as people can aford to buy and run these boats they think they are entitled to do as they please.
#7
Posted 20 December 2011 - 08:40 AM
#8
Posted 20 December 2011 - 08:43 AM
Happy Fisherman, on 19 December 2011 - 08:41 PM, said:
Our enforcement resources are already stretched too thin. It comes down to each individual boat user and boat owner to drive and ensure your boat is driven responsibly.
The Upper Pitt River would be first on my list of concerns. I know stories have made it to the TV and print media about the high number of jet boats running the river, sometimes way too fast and too close to shore. I guess as long as people can aford to buy and run these boats they think they are entitled to do as they please.
I hang with a crew that runs the Pitt and I see no problem with what they are up to? They aren't jumping sand bars and all that crap.
Look if you want to make jet boats less destructive outlaw some of the hull modifications like polymers and plastics on the hull - THAT'S what makes guys feel bullet proof and allow them to degrade habitat should they have the desire.
Look at it this way if I put armoured plating all around my CAR and started not caring where I merged there would be a little fall-out from my fellow motorists.
Realise SOME are out there to run the river to fish rather than burn up fuel and wreck stuff, and you'll get responsible jetters behind you.
#9
Posted 25 December 2011 - 12:51 PM
Trevor Shpeley, on 18 December 2011 - 09:53 AM, said:
I agree that most jet-boaters are out to get to a fishing spot, and disturbance of other users is minimized. The few who revel in bringing noise and disorder to the outdoors are generally impermeable to education, since sharing the chaos of their experience is a primary motivation. Think wakeboard boats with massive speakers and unmuffled Harleys. These few approach the day with a "bleep everybody else, look at me" attitude, and nothing short of making an example out of a few with hefty fines will get their attention. Glad that people are chiming in on this topic! I am not in blanket opposition to jet boats in LARGER rivers, having been in them myself, and understand that peace and good fishing returns to a run minutes after the boat has passed.
#10
Posted 25 December 2011 - 12:55 PM
Happy Fisherman, on 19 December 2011 - 08:41 PM, said:
Our enforcement resources are already stretched too thin. It comes down to each individual boat user and boat owner to drive and ensure your boat is driven responsibly.
The Upper Pitt River would be first on my list of concerns. I know stories have made it to the TV and print media about the high number of jet boats running the river, sometimes way too fast and too close to shore. I guess as long as people can aford to buy and run these boats they think they are entitled to do as they please.
I have been on a guided trip on the Upper Pitt in early Summer, when the river is in flood and the Bulls are running. It is a small river in the Fall when jetboaters flock there for salmon, and it is unfathomable how anybody could get in a day's fishing with the boats blasting through skinny water.
#11
Posted 25 December 2011 - 12:57 PM
Happy Fisherman, on 20 December 2011 - 08:40 AM, said:
That would be the show. The stream that they were blasting through was TINY! Absolutely mind-boggling that people felt free to promote this as an activity.

Sign In
Register
Help




MultiQuote

